What's so hard for me in developing a rubric is to hit all the aspects of the project that are important without being nit-picky or overly specific that it puts the students in a corner. I really feel that I found that balance in this rubric!
Infographic rubric:
Exceeds expectations
|
Meets expectations
|
Needs improvement
|
POINTS
|
|
Research
(weight x2)
|
Includes a variety of information directly related to the topic.
Information is accurate and informative.
|
Includes information related to the topic. There may be minor
irrelevancies or unnecessary information.
|
Only some information provided, or a lot of information is inaccurate
or irrelevant. Leaves the reader in need of clarification.
|
Out of 6
|
Design
|
Infographic is neat, organized, easy to follow, legible, and includes
well placed pictures and information.
|
Infographic has some parts that are hard to follow, or a picture may
be placed poorly, but otherwise can be understood.
|
Design is difficult to follow, a lot of pictures and information are placed
poorly, the reader is confused.
|
Out of 3
|
Creativity
|
Infographic includes fun, legible font(s), colors that are easy to
read, and images that directly relate to the topic.
|
Infographic includes some color, poor font choice, may be difficult
to read in some parts, but overall shows some thought and effort.
|
Appears poorly done, either in a rush or with little thought or
effort.
|
Out of 3
|
Graphics and
Pictures
|
Images are directly related to the topic and enhance the learning
experience.
|
Graphics are related to topic but do not add to the learning
experience – only there to add color and dimension.
|
There are no images, images are not related to topic, or images are
of poor quality.
|
Out of 3
|
Mechanics/ Grammar/
Spelling
|
Language is clear and informative. Spelling and grammatical mistakes
are minimal and do not cause confusion.
|
There are several spelling or grammar mistakes that are mostly
comprehensible. Mistakes do not detract from learning.
|
Spelling and grammar mistakes are incomprehensible and cause
confusion.
|
Out of 3
|
Sources
|
Listed at bottom, easy to find. Wikipedia not cited.
|
No sources, or Wikipedia is cited.
|
Out of 2
|
|
On time
|
On time
|
Late 1 Day -10
Late 2 Days -20
Late 3 days -30
Late 4 days -40
Late 5 Days -50
6+ days late earns a 0.
|
||
FINAL GRADE
|
Or view it here: https://goo.gl/70hTo9
Anyways, I had two favorite projects from this experiment. I'm sharing them, with their permission and the names blocked out, to show how awesome they came out! The projects are the students' original submissions, with no corrections made on my part.
Okay, so yeah, it's a little short on info, but the look and the style is exactly what I expected! Sure, it's a bit amateur, but the kid is 14! Cut them some slack! I think it's great for the first time EVER doing one!
Here's another one. There are minor grammar errors, and they cited Wikipedia (tsk, tsk), but the format is awesome! (It's a scan so I apologize for the odd line on the right.)
I love how it's color coded, the info and pictures go back and forth, it's so easy to read and follow! And there's tons of information, they really put in a lot of effort!
Overall, I'm very pleased with the results. It's actually fun to grade these projects, unlike the boring research papers I used to assign. I am going to be using this project for years to come.